| Title |
Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: Is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0141076816680120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Jeffrey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 26% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 25 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 67% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 512 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 18% |
| Unknown | 175 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 102 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 17% |
| Psychology | 35 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 11% |
| Unknown | 194 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 441. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#64,289
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#35
of 3,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,423
of 421,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#1
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.