↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

Are People Becoming More Entitled Over Time? Not in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Are People Becoming More Entitled Over Time? Not in New Zealand
Published in
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, October 2017
DOI 10.1177/0146167217733079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Stronge, Petar Milojev, Chris G. Sibley

Abstract

It is a common conception that entitlement is increasing among younger generations over time. However, although there is some evidence for this trend, other findings are less conclusive. The current research investigated change in psychological entitlement across the adult lifespan for men and women (ages 19-74), using six annual waves of data (2009-2014) from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study ( N = 10,412). We employed Cohort-Sequential Latent Growth Modeling to assess mean-level change in entitlement. Entitlement was found to be generally unchanging over time for both men and women, with only those aged 65 and above showing increasing entitlement. Entitlement showed a steady downward trend across age. These findings from a large national probability sample suggest that change in entitlement may follow a decreasing developmental trend across the lifespan. In New Zealand, at least, there is no evidence for a narcissism epidemic.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 56%
Unspecified 3 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#287,129
of 13,628,925 outputs
Outputs from Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
#265
of 2,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,420
of 273,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,628,925 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.