↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

‘Allocation concealment’: the evolution and adoption of a methodological term

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
‘Allocation concealment’: the evolution and adoption of a methodological term
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1177/0141076818776604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth F Schulz, I Chalmers, DG Altman, DA Grimes, D Moher, RJ Hayes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,882,145
of 13,343,384 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#500
of 1,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,545
of 269,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,343,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.