↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

The cuts and poor health: when and how can we say that one thing causes another?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
52 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
The cuts and poor health: when and how can we say that one thing causes another?
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1177/0141076818779237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucinda Hiam, Danny Dorling, Martin McKee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Researcher 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#389,008
of 12,502,994 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#139
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,748
of 270,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,502,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.