↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

The cuts and poor health: when and how can we say that one thing causes another?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
The cuts and poor health: when and how can we say that one thing causes another?
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1177/0141076818779237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucinda Hiam, Danny Dorling, Martin McKee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#377,697
of 13,526,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#129
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,484
of 270,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,526,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.