↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Failing to encourage physical activity with wearable technology: what next?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Failing to encourage physical activity with wearable technology: what next?
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.1177/0141076818788856
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Ellis, Lukasz Piwek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 33%
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 14%
Computer Science 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#402,111
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#127
of 2,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,694
of 329,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.