↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

Seborrheic Keratosis in the Auricle: A Rare Tumor

Overview of attention for article published in ENT: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Seborrheic Keratosis in the Auricle: A Rare Tumor
Published in
ENT: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, February 2019
DOI 10.1177/0145561319830069
Authors

Chang Eui Hong, Yeejeong Kim, Hyun Seung Choi, Junhui Jeong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#9,138,790
of 14,553,216 outputs
Outputs from ENT: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
#114
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,647
of 265,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ENT: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,553,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.