↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

Genetically modified plants and human health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 1,858)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
95 tweeters
facebook
26 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
638 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetically modified plants and human health
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2008
DOI 10.1258/jrsm.2008.070372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzie Key, Julian K-C Ma, Pascal MW Drake

Abstract

Genetically modified (or GM) plants have attracted a large amount of media attention in recent years and continue to do so. Despite this, the general public remains largely unaware of what a GM plant actually is or what advantages and disadvantages the technology has to offer, particularly with regard to the range of applications for which they can be used. From the first generation of GM crops, two main areas of concern have emerged, namely risk to the environment and risk to human health. As GM plants are gradually being introduced into the European Union there is likely to be increasing public concern regarding potential health issues. Although it is now commonplace for the press to adopt 'health campaigns', the information they publish is often unreliable and unrepresentative of the available scientific evidence. We consider it important that the medical profession should be aware of the state of the art, and, as they are often the first port of call for a concerned patient, be in a position to provide an informed opinion. This review will examine how GM plants may impact on human health both directly - through applications targeted at nutrition and enhancement of recombinant medicine production - but also indirectly, through potential effects on the environment. Finally, it will examine the most important opposition currently facing the worldwide adoption of this technology: public opinion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 638 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 614 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 282 44%
Student > Master 122 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 9%
Researcher 50 8%
Unspecified 48 8%
Other 79 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 211 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 110 17%
Unspecified 61 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 9%
Environmental Science 31 5%
Other 167 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#48,893
of 13,493,721 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#24
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228
of 119,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,493,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.