↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

Genetically modified plants and human health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,816)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
92 tweeters
facebook
26 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
618 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetically modified plants and human health
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2008
DOI 10.1258/jrsm.2008.070372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzie Key, Julian K-C Ma, Pascal MW Drake

Abstract

Genetically modified (or GM) plants have attracted a large amount of media attention in recent years and continue to do so. Despite this, the general public remains largely unaware of what a GM plant actually is or what advantages and disadvantages the technology has to offer, particularly with regard to the range of applications for which they can be used. From the first generation of GM crops, two main areas of concern have emerged, namely risk to the environment and risk to human health. As GM plants are gradually being introduced into the European Union there is likely to be increasing public concern regarding potential health issues. Although it is now commonplace for the press to adopt 'health campaigns', the information they publish is often unreliable and unrepresentative of the available scientific evidence. We consider it important that the medical profession should be aware of the state of the art, and, as they are often the first port of call for a concerned patient, be in a position to provide an informed opinion. This review will examine how GM plants may impact on human health both directly - through applications targeted at nutrition and enhancement of recombinant medicine production - but also indirectly, through potential effects on the environment. Finally, it will examine the most important opposition currently facing the worldwide adoption of this technology: public opinion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 594 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 278 45%
Student > Master 115 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 9%
Researcher 47 8%
Unspecified 44 7%
Other 79 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 209 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 110 18%
Unspecified 58 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 9%
Engineering 29 5%
Other 155 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#47,405
of 12,966,689 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#23
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237
of 118,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,966,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them