RT @PaulGlasziou: @anniemccluskey2 @saeboukglyn @blamlab @researchphysio @JonesFio @dr_nickward Lots of variation to that 17 years, and wai…
@anniemccluskey2 @saeboukglyn @blamlab @researchphysio @JonesFio @dr_nickward Lots of variation to that 17 years, and waiting is no guarantee. https://t.co/bVW0Di8Vdk Maybe consider a “Handbook of NonDrug Interventions” for stroke rehab? https://t.co/27NMY
The complexity of evidence behind the 17 year translation lag...
RT @MirekQI: @benthebray Assume you have come across this https://t.co/W9ta3aORtj
RT @MirekQI: @benthebray Assume you have come across this https://t.co/W9ta3aORtj
@benthebray Assume you have come across this https://t.co/W9ta3aORtj
@chanlea Well, there's this: "It is frequently stated that it takes an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice." (https://t.co/BFcpApOngU). That said, there may be specific contexts (e.g. elites training 2X/day) where the "wind
@jd_wilko Ha! I think this paper is super interesting because it takes a canard in clinical implementation work and shows how varied the actual data are. https://t.co/sH15ijG4x7
@dariustahir @RebeccaDRobbins Citations here: https://t.co/vDo2QkuY3c It will take 17 more years for this talking point to grow stale
Citation needed: https://t.co/xfmeN79O90
RT @LanceShaver: @GatewayMedic @JRossfamilymed @RobinSaunders51 @adriandix @jjhorgan @HealthMatchBC @UBCDFP Here's the source for future re…
@GatewayMedic @JRossfamilymed @RobinSaunders51 @adriandix @jjhorgan @HealthMatchBC @UBCDFP Here's the source for future reference. Love using that stat. Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: under
RT @pafournier: @cwhogg @jayparkinson 17 years. https://t.co/8xoOOAWLBv
@trulleau Il y a celui-ci : https://t.co/glL8gx8mlE qui cite parmi bien d'autres celui qu'évoque @Robin_Physio : https://t.co/k0GLbz9YBw
@trumanfrancis Hi James https://t.co/FLBEg5DKoO
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research - Zoë Slote Morris, Steven Wooding, Jonathan Grant, 2011 https://t.co/4DfMhQ0GLQ
@DrPoorman Whaaaat?! I always thought it was 7 years, so thx for sharing this. I'll share a similar policy factoid in return :) It takes on avg 17 years for research knowledge to become policy/practice. https://t.co/YLJf5TJiS3
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/c3p5dLoeOA
It takes 17 years for the average medical research to reach actual practices. How are you tapping into new care practices? https://t.co/FHtz04szQg
@yaroslav_f @SGottliebFDA @IAmBiotech Absolutely. But then you have to look at the lag between that new understanding and the translation into standard practices of care. Then % of time those standards are adhered to/adopted. BTW, the lag is 17yrs - https:
Shocked by hearing this statistic via @nphillipsca : only 15% of science makes it into practice, and it takes on average 17 years between. Found a reference as well: https://t.co/rU7BAFyXlc
And the rest of us thought it took as little as 17yrs for research to translate into practice - https://t.co/hTaxIIJ0qW
@Elcondederoca Cuidado. La sanidad no es gratuita, es pública. Y los avances y nuevos descubrimientos tardan MUCHO en implantarse, una media de 17 años según estudios como este. No es prepotente interesarse por su propia enfermedad, es también responsabili
RT @JuanGrvas: A classic. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Un clásico. Des…
A classic. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Un clásico. Desde la demostración indudable del beneficio-daño de una intervención pasan 17 años hasta que se convierte en rutina. https://t.co/X7s
RT @NELFTResearch: @B_loved_Knight also asked "How (quickly) does NHS research go from research to implementation?" #NoStupidResearchQuesti…
@B_loved_Knight also asked "How (quickly) does NHS research go from research to implementation?" #NoStupidResearchQuestions referenced article: https://t.co/IJOMn1JrIU https://t.co/wUIo3GJQWj
17 years?!? We can do better. Thank you @JosephHsuMD for sharing.
@AndrewSheeanMD @DrChadKrueger Great platform for dissemination of research. Hopefully will help beat 17 lag... https://t.co/16S5M8iv8n #altmetrics
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
Implementeringsfeltets favoritt-referanse, at det tar 17 år å innføre nye behandlingsmetoder, har visst også nådd @BentHHoyre. Men hvor dette tallet kommer fra og om det er til å stole på er et komplisert spørsmål: https://t.co/VLRKBVaYif https://t.co/Tvxc
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
RT @alvarohidalgo19: 17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los paci…
17 años se tarda en trasladar los descubrimientos científicos a la práctica clínica, a beneficios reales para los pacientes. https://t.co/jS5MNAVjmN https://t.co/EG9ts2vQUM
RT @PamelaSnow2: @ehanford Given that it takes on average 17 yrs* to translate research into practice, this study is ready to go in 2019! h…
RT @PamelaSnow2: @ehanford Given that it takes on average 17 yrs* to translate research into practice, this study is ready to go in 2019! h…
@ehanford Given that it takes on average 17 yrs* to translate research into practice, this study is ready to go in 2019! https://t.co/hTaxIIJ0qW *Does not apply to #neuroflapdoodle in education. That takes about 17 seconds 🙄
@0x526978 @KhazWolf @hailsith @TakeThatMorals @Soapbox_Atheist Appeal to consensus is (1) a logical fallacy and (2) the position of the medical community lags research by an average of 17 years. https://t.co/DbQPF79aqL
@PhysioNetwork @CGMMaher @tomgoom @CorKinetic @mickwhughes @Running_Physio @JoanneLKemp @JOSPT @FionaWilsonf @NicolvanDyk @alisongrimaldi @ToddHargrove @msk_health Here is an example of secondary research: it is a review answering this exact question: http
Incredible. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/DVYes6MNJS
RT @Retlouping: @dr_nickward Yep but the gap in that is reported as 17 years I’ll be dead by then 😊 https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq https://t.co/U…
RT @Retlouping: @dr_nickward Yep but the gap in that is reported as 17 years I’ll be dead by then 😊 https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq https://t.co/U…
@KateAllatt @AvrilDrummond1 @JonesFio @69Clarkey @Stroketattler @tibbytoad @brin1958 Ask again in 17 years time, smiley face, smiley face #strokerecovery https://t.co/6ORpPrm6Kw
@dr_nickward Yep but the gap in that is reported as 17 years I’ll be dead by then 😊 https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq https://t.co/UzGImmFBHD
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/cw9s7ZSgcl
RT @annickjanson: Can we put this down to the phenomenon of “time lags in translational research”? https://t.co/r5iFriJ4v4 https://t.co/CCq…
Can we put this down to the phenomenon of “time lags in translational research”? https://t.co/r5iFriJ4v4
@AReidATC I believe I once read it takes 17 years for new evidence based information to become standard practice in clinical setting. https://t.co/384qgJ12IN
"So we don't have to depend on the 17 years of passive diffusion" Hallelujah! https://t.co/p71D7UsubW #timelags #lhscollaboratory
RT @BlaiseDoran: @TaylorAlanJ @GregLehman @Brad_Neal_07 @CGMMaher @Retlouping That is certainly one of my concerns. I’ve seen it occur “liv…
@GregLehman @stevemagness @Coach_Alejo Sometimes I question the 17-year stat, but more often than not, it proves its worth https://t.co/lXGTo0j04U
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in #translational #research https://t.co/l4ZTxJUQK9
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/iMcojRKUYN
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/BU84ESz7Ww
だんだんできることが増えているように感じて、実はまだまだできてないことがあったりする。 別の研究では、人間が習慣化するまでに必要な期間は約60日必要と報告されている。 そう考えると自分の治療方針、コンセプトみたいなものはシンプルな方がいいと改めて実感。
RT @t_nishi_t: エビデンスが臨床に定着するまで,17年かかるらしい.スクリーニングツールを臨床に定着させることが,自分のしばらくの仕事. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding tim…
RT @t_nishi_t: エビデンスが臨床に定着するまで,17年かかるらしい.スクリーニングツールを臨床に定着させることが,自分のしばらくの仕事. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding tim…
RT @t_nishi_t: エビデンスが臨床に定着するまで,17年かかるらしい.スクリーニングツールを臨床に定着させることが,自分のしばらくの仕事. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding tim…
RT @t_nishi_t: エビデンスが臨床に定着するまで,17年かかるらしい.スクリーニングツールを臨床に定着させることが,自分のしばらくの仕事. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding tim…
RT @t_nishi_t: エビデンスが臨床に定着するまで,17年かかるらしい.スクリーニングツールを臨床に定着させることが,自分のしばらくの仕事. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding tim…
エビデンスが臨床に定着するまで,17年かかるらしい.スクリーニングツールを臨床に定着させることが,自分のしばらくの仕事. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. https://t.co/0q3nmG5P4X
RT @pafournier: 17 years between research evidence and clinical practice. What can we do to accelerate this? https://t.co/8xoOOAWLBv https:…
"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" 17 years is a long time. #SoMe #MedEd https://t.co/IOpcWzxXTc
@jodiebreach @DrChrisBarton @SportsTherapy56 @DrDylanM @Peter_Gettings Depressingly it’s not 14, it’s 17: https://t.co/AZ2emS7V3p
@ahider @DrG_NHS One point, Andrew, which I think I have seen you make in a presentation, is the time it takes for credible research to get translated into practice. https://t.co/xRKKhzuoz8
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
J'ose espérer qu'aujourd'hui c'est plus rapide...
RT @TuttlePhD: This is clear evidence that all scientists, yes even YOU, should make efforts to nurture your findings and publications by c…
RT @TuttlePhD: This is clear evidence that all scientists, yes even YOU, should make efforts to nurture your findings and publications by c…
RT @TuttlePhD: This is clear evidence that all scientists, yes even YOU, should make efforts to nurture your findings and publications by c…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @TuttlePhD: This is clear evidence that all scientists, yes even YOU, should make efforts to nurture your findings and publications by c…
RT @TuttlePhD: This is clear evidence that all scientists, yes even YOU, should make efforts to nurture your findings and publications by c…
This is clear evidence that all scientists, yes even YOU, should make efforts to nurture your findings and publications by communicating them to the public. Dont let your work be doomed to the annals of history!
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @TuttlePhD: This is why more dedicated projects to expedite science translation are *critically* needed to implement well-established me…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…