RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @TuttlePhD: This is why more dedicated projects to expedite science translation are *critically* needed to implement well-established me…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
This is why more dedicated projects to expedite science translation are *critically* needed to implement well-established medical science solutions:
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
RT @DrCChambers: Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for ch…
Various estimates show that it takes on average 17 years for research findings to impact practice. That is too long for children in pain and their families. https://t.co/F2BoXKBlHy #OpenAccess #ItDoesntHaveToHurt #IASPCongress https://t.co/DlZ6V7PlPB
@Scastleclarke @RichardTaunt And this was the original review .... https://t.co/fEPSPzY6Vy The policy question here is not actually the 17 years (which is an average - possibly a truncated one) but the distribution ie why do some things go fast and other
@jasonleitch @Lallison2002 @RichardTaunt And more recently..... https://t.co/tYquq6N4kI
@RichardTaunt Maybe take a look at: https://t.co/uKLakvgO5J
Since this very worthy organization supports evidence-based practice, rather than just calling bullsh*t on the 17 years, I thought I'd try to source it! A very diligent review is here (https://t.co/mBtzcEAcOZ) suggesting 17 is the answer but the question v
RT @schoolofsurgery: @juliomayol @SWexner 1. Reducing the time between RCT and adoption into clinical practice - currently 17 years (https:…
RT @schoolofsurgery: @juliomayol @SWexner 1. Reducing the time between RCT and adoption into clinical practice - currently 17 years (https:…
RT @schoolofsurgery: @juliomayol @SWexner 1. Reducing the time between RCT and adoption into clinical practice - currently 17 years (https:…
RT @schoolofsurgery: @juliomayol @SWexner 1. Reducing the time between RCT and adoption into clinical practice - currently 17 years (https:…
@juliomayol @SWexner 1. Reducing the time between RCT and adoption into clinical practice - currently 17 years (https://t.co/as9z12jMQE) by making all peer-reviewed publications free to access (hint @BJSurgery @AnnalsofSurgery)
@RyanMarino Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520. https://t.co/wObGwaiG3R
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/TDCZ07eLWa
A2: Definitely agree with those saying we need greater emphasis on health policy - we need to make sure the research we do has practical implications and can be translated into practice (and not take 17 years to do so...https://t.co/UnoozalpzI). #behaviora
RT @SarahChapman30: Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @SarahChapman30: Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @SarahChapman30: Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neur…
Bad News: Human #brain most complicated thing in universe Reveals its secrets only slowly/in small packages Great #neuroscience progress hasnt yet helped one patient No low hanging fruit Good News Already have tools to help most #MentalIllness Problem is
RT @SarahChapman30: Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
RT @SarahChapman30: Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
Thankfully the answer is not 42 https://t.co/Y1cUuuLk3M
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @Mental_Elf: Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
Why does it take so long for research to actually have an impact on patients? #OxfordImpact2018 https://t.co/dhHW3wBuwA
RT @SarahChapman30: Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
Here's that paper - The answer is 17 years... https://t.co/37RQHyuASD #oxfordimpact2018
RT @deNutrients: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/7AilAjq5Ra *S…
RT @deNutrients: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/7AilAjq5Ra *S…
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/7AilAjq5Ra *Stick with it, even if things don't go as expected others may follow in your footsteps. Change takes time, 17 years or even more. #beha
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/7AilAjq5Ra
RT @TheSGEM: @DavidLBrownMD @JMVenturini @drjohnm It takes over 10yrs for high-quality, clinically relevant information to make the patient…
RT @pash22: Understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/hujb2toW0q https://t.co/qnbxroNc5c
Understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/hujb2toW0q https://t.co/qnbxroNc5c
RT @TheSGEM: @DavidLBrownMD @JMVenturini @drjohnm It takes over 10yrs for high-quality, clinically relevant information to make the patient…
@DavidLBrownMD @JMVenturini @drjohnm It takes over 10yrs for high-quality, clinically relevant information to make the patients bedside. https://t.co/f5UALIIbbw Seven leaks in the knowledge translation pipeline. https://t.co/thnd2rue4m
@kate_bowman @Damian_Roland @First10EM https://t.co/8XuNmtOBvm. It takes 17 years on average for practice to change after research proves that it should.
On average, there is a lag of about 17 years for new medical discoveries to be implemented into clinical practice https://t.co/wFT97IH3mw
RT @J_MacIndoe: A2: I feel we need to find ways to speed up the time it takes scientific research to make its way into daily life and use.…
A2: I feel we need to find ways to speed up the time it takes scientific research to make its way into daily life and use. On average, it can take up to 17 years! #BaycrestChat https://t.co/zvjjnVY2Nw https://t.co/95IkIPMj7o
@jbschreiber @seastarbatita One of several sources on this stat: https://t.co/nn91vm6rKw
RT @Cfstep: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. https://t.co/DRyjWRcy48 https:…
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. https://t.co/DRyjWRcy48 https://t.co/dKN1N5ad2Q
17 years is to long.... https://t.co/BnUMT2DVCa
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Ucj8WWwzFm @UniteSoutien @reseau1quebec @McGillPBRN @McGillFamMed
It takes an average of 17 years for new research findings to reach clinical practice and be applied to patient’s care, study published in the J R Soc Med says. https://t.co/cHnGslxecv Be an informed patient, do some reading re your own health to discuss
Writing talk @KingsCollegeLon @Kings_SPHES masters #publichealth programme on #primarycare & #innovation great reference average 17yrs for #research evidence to reach clinical practice https://t.co/mSglSec6yw
RT @JuanGrvas: 17 años. Lo que pasa para llevar la investigación a la clínica. 17 años perdidos. The answer is 17 years, what is the questi…
RT @JuanGrvas: 17 años. Lo que pasa para llevar la investigación a la clínica. 17 años perdidos. The answer is 17 years, what is the questi…
RT @JuanGrvas: 17 años. Lo que pasa para llevar la investigación a la clínica. 17 años perdidos. The answer is 17 years, what is the questi…
17 años. Lo que pasa para llevar la investigación a la clínica. 17 años perdidos. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Translation of research into practice is a good thing but... https://t.co/l4
RT @JuanGrvas: Un clásico. Desde la publicación a la consulta: 17 años. ¿Cómo entender esta lentitud en ciencia médica? https://t.co/l4TtUq…
RT @JuanGrvas: Un clásico. Desde la publicación a la consulta: 17 años. ¿Cómo entender esta lentitud en ciencia médica? https://t.co/l4TtUq…
@EMManchester @CritCareReviews It takes >10 years for high-quality, clinical relevant information to the patients bedside. https://t.co/f5UALIqzMW https://t.co/TN9AwyJHvL
@ABCTNOW I heard it recently decreased to 17 years. Just googled and found this reference regarding translational #health #research: https://t.co/iTRbvztGFO @AliMattu https://t.co/GENuG6tS2R
RT @JPreston_SLP: I wonder where the field of SLP will be in 17 yrs https://t.co/ctGIIBxB6j
I wonder where the field of SLP will be in 17 yrs https://t.co/ctGIIBxB6j
@Wilkinsonjonny @Gas_Craic Seven leaks in the knowledge translation pathway according to the Pathman Model. https://t.co/f5UALIIbbw @SAEMEBM #FOAMed https://t.co/HA03hZRbUw
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
mt #translational The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding t… https://t.co/9WS0aFcXky, see more https://t.co/n3pMIRVV53
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
RT @kristaconnell: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/Es45A5yims
RT @rwilly2003: @KinesKing @Knee_Howells You're dating yourself, @KinesKing! Actually, 20 yrs is pretty close to this https://t.co/qUKx58h3…
RT @rwilly2003: @KinesKing @Knee_Howells You're dating yourself, @KinesKing! Actually, 20 yrs is pretty close to this https://t.co/qUKx58h3…
@KinesKing @Knee_Howells You're dating yourself, @KinesKing! Actually, 20 yrs is pretty close to this https://t.co/qUKx58h3Bd.
RT @TheSGEM: @drmickmolloy @umanamd https://t.co/sSoBMKF462 tries to cut the KT window down from >10yrs to <1yr using #FOAMed https://t.co…
@drmickmolloy @umanamd https://t.co/sSoBMKF462 tries to cut the KT window down from >10yrs to <1yr using #FOAMed https://t.co/f5UALIIbbw https://t.co/HZuQZ5RADt https://t.co/HH3Il9O6Tu
@SnarkyMD @ssppeerroo @KatieDawn3 @John_CFS @AnneSpaceCoast @kevinmd @acpinternist @davidtuller1 @marydimmock @JanetDafoe The problem is that it takes a very long time for standard of care to catch up with the scientific literature. https://t.co/E58Q0h7T4M