It takes time for things to percolate @thinkpsychol @AdamMeakins https://t.co/GAHJsfUITl
RT @Nim_Perera: As researchers WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY! #SoMe👉vehicle to reduce this 17yr lag! @BJSM_BMJ @karenlitzyNYC doing great work…
RT @Nim_Perera: As researchers WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY! #SoMe👉vehicle to reduce this 17yr lag! @BJSM_BMJ @karenlitzyNYC doing great work…
As researchers WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY! #SoMe👉vehicle to reduce this 17yr lag! @BJSM_BMJ @karenlitzyNYC doing great work in this space! ☺👍 https://t.co/oAUMrrzedw
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
RT @LarsHaugvad: #iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Ua…
#iocatpc2016 How much of our knowledge do reach the patient? 17years time lag for translation of research! https://t.co/Uac34GyuxS https://t.co/ptIPWwNQa6
RT @Retlouping: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq
RT @zajctjasa: From innovation to adoption: the answer is 17 years, but what is the question? https://t.co/CUlBEuNMhx https://t.co/Gxm9C6SA…
From innovation to adoption: the answer is 17 years, but what is the question? https://t.co/CUlBEuNMhx https://t.co/Gxm9C6SAA2
RT @Retlouping: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq
@BKnipferDC other issue is evidence adoption "17 years" is the touted time https://t.co/U42Qq9oLqq
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
RT @drjfrank: Classic, hotly debated, #mustread paper...Should be in all of our collections. #meded #diffusionofinnovations #research https…
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
RT @drjfrank: Classic, hotly debated, #mustread paper...Should be in all of our collections. #meded #diffusionofinnovations #research https…
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
RT @drjfrank: Classic, hotly debated, #mustread paper...Should be in all of our collections. #meded #diffusionofinnovations #research https…
RT @drjfrank: Classic, hotly debated, #mustread paper...Should be in all of our collections. #meded #diffusionofinnovations #research https…
RT @drjfrank: Classic, hotly debated, #mustread paper...Should be in all of our collections. #meded #diffusionofinnovations #research https…
Classic, hotly debated, #mustread paper...Should be in all of our collections. #meded #diffusionofinnovations #research https://t.co/UNfgWuaZH2
RT @ffolliet: The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
Thanks- was looking for this! https://t.co/cKrrXkkyXZ
The paper SHOWING 17 year time lag in research to practice https://t.co/JMIlNsDZI8 @EMSRC16 @TJCoats
@DrHowieMell doesn't everyone believe their research is key? https://t.co/7v9cakSSLx
RT @BetterEval: Astonishing report of 17 year time lag between knowledge from science and clinical health practice. https://t.co/rDY3aFACS2…
RT @BetterEval: Astonishing report of 17 year time lag between knowledge from science and clinical health practice. https://t.co/rDY3aFACS2…
RT @BetterEval: Astonishing report of 17 year time lag between knowledge from science and clinical health practice. https://t.co/rDY3aFACS2…
Theory policy practice gaps abound. https://t.co/lOwezzlJyT
RT @BetterEval: Astonishing report of 17 year time lag between knowledge from science and clinical health practice. https://t.co/rDY3aFACS2…
RT @BetterEval: Astonishing report of 17 year time lag between knowledge from science and clinical health practice. https://t.co/rDY3aFACS2…
How long has it taken for einstein's 100 year old revelations to enter people's consciousness? https://t.co/HrDaELtJyf
Astonishing report of 17 year time lag between knowledge from science and clinical health practice. https://t.co/rDY3aFACS2 #EES2016
RT @sjz1983: I'm surprised it's only 17. Antivaxxers make it seem like 117. https://t.co/P6b3HxjW6W
I'm surprised it's only 17. Antivaxxers make it seem like 117. https://t.co/P6b3HxjW6W
It takes 17 years for society to catch up with health science. have you read the latest vaccine research? https://t.co/J5T5J8KQoX
RT @remy_doc: Why doesn't your doctor know all of this? Turns out the average medical practice is nearly two decades behind... https://t.co…
Why doesn't your doctor know all of this? Turns out the average medical practice is nearly two decades behind... https://t.co/ieAlyJc8Nk
Time from research to practice The complex answer, sort of, is 17 years https://t.co/p6hlgaxEM7 @OfficialNIHR https://t.co/83OBAg1vei
might be worse in medicine where time lag in health research translation is 17 years https://t.co/9LQeNA3JDz https://t.co/11TBeM6BOb
RT @kate_hayward_: 17 year time lag from development of health interventions to patient benefit! #IVSTEP #thisneedstochange https://t.co/p3…
RT @kate_hayward_: 17 year time lag from development of health interventions to patient benefit! #IVSTEP #thisneedstochange https://t.co/p3…
RT @kate_hayward_: 17 year time lag from development of health interventions to patient benefit! #IVSTEP #thisneedstochange https://t.co/p3…
RT @kate_hayward_: 17 year time lag from development of health interventions to patient benefit! #IVSTEP #thisneedstochange https://t.co/p3…
RT @kate_hayward_: 17 year time lag from development of health interventions to patient benefit! #IVSTEP #thisneedstochange https://t.co/p3…
17 year time lag from development of health interventions to patient benefit! #IVSTEP #thisneedstochange https://t.co/p3OEtS2sjN
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/QDVfliX3H7
@ChadEpps @SSHorg the half-life might be 5.5yrs but the knowledge translation from research to bedside is 17yrs https://t.co/H8vctxlgqt
@Trevail sadly longer Tim... 17 years, but probably getting fasster nowadays, i hope, here's a link https://t.co/OYLe2aUzw1
RT @jonathancgrant: @researchimpact And here is the paper: https://t.co/uH2ItiNjPo.
RT @jonathancgrant: @researchimpact And here is the paper: https://t.co/uH2ItiNjPo.
@researchimpact And here is the paper: https://t.co/uH2ItiNjPo.
@AdamMeakins @Jonny_King_PT altered,dominance,maladaptive,driven... why not focus on agreement in nomenclature 1st? https://t.co/pdDXzhn2Ss
RT @MarijnUlrich: 17 Jaar tussen wetenschap en praktijk...wat zijn de barrières? Tijd, vaardigheid, gedrag? https://t.co/wLwHU7BXL3 #EBP
17 Jaar tussen wetenschap en praktijk...wat zijn de barrières? Tijd, vaardigheid, gedrag? https://t.co/wLwHU7BXL3 #EBP
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
RT @danrhon: "17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
"17 years between research to clinical practice" #OARSI16 https://t.co/WQCE7cUEQn
It takes that long for a medical innovation to reach adoption: The answer is 17 years. https://t.co/KlHt2aYdol
This explains why functional/integrative medicine, no matter how popular and effective at either the research or... https://t.co/Q9IjhNy8fu
RT @grebeccahaines: then 17 years 2 clinical practice!https://t.co/HIbpO46pf2 @PCORI #imaging3 #pfcc https://t.co/zQKauk9Yu0
RT @grebeccahaines: then 17 years 2 clinical practice!https://t.co/HIbpO46pf2 @PCORI #imaging3 #pfcc https://t.co/zQKauk9Yu0
RT @grebeccahaines: then 17 years 2 clinical practice!https://t.co/HIbpO46pf2 @PCORI #imaging3 #pfcc https://t.co/zQKauk9Yu0
then 17 years 2 clinical practice!https://t.co/HIbpO46pf2 @PCORI #imaging3 #pfcc https://t.co/zQKauk9Yu0
RT @michael_smit: @ChantelRidsdale @dalsimnews The paper that reported 17 years is now part of the reading list for Research Methods. https…
RT @michael_smit: @ChantelRidsdale @dalsimnews The paper that reported 17 years is now part of the reading list for Research Methods. https…
@ChantelRidsdale @dalsimnews The paper that reported 17 years is now part of the reading list for Research Methods. https://t.co/LIzicpVGcK
@Jeff__Riddell @noolslucas @ketaminh @TheSGEM @LWestafer also; https://t.co/SV2fV8zCpb "the answer is 17 yrs..."
@Jeff__Riddell @LWestafer How about this one to start? https://t.co/ch24tcYmvT
RT @MDaware: @avkwong @concernecus in general, 17 years [10-25] for KT https://t.co/ieCC6271Pk lots of variation
@avkwong @concernecus in general, 17 years [10-25] for KT https://t.co/ieCC6271Pk lots of variation
RT @DrDannySands: Nadia Anwar from @Oracle cites good review of 17 yr delay from basic science research to clinical care: http://t.co/kdI53…
Nadia Anwar from @Oracle cites good review of 17 yr delay from basic science research to clinical care: http://t.co/kdI53bXODt @PMedEU
@atulbutte @mbeisen @dgmacarthur though here's a paper saying data around 17y estim is poor: http://t.co/61iMpH1sqt
@ChrysMuirhead @AllenFrancesMD Trouble: Conventional MDs give info based on 17yo info. http://t.co/55e65vSsbJ Wait not in public interest.
Understanding lag times in translational research. Important for investigators and investors. http://t.co/tFJyeWQrhC
It takes an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice - http://t.co/890SiEThXM via @NCBI
@SpineCareDoc @AdaGiudiceTomps @andrewkolodny Once I learned this http://t.co/6UFcCnKTuE , everything about the medical system made sense.
@libertylives277 Tragically, we are. Try this: http://t.co/6UFcCnKTuE
RT @DrKND: The lag time between new scientific research and the research showing up in medical practice is 'only' 17 years! http://t.co/Uc7…
@ashleyy0019 I have always understood ~10yrs....this paper say 17yrs http://t.co/H8vctxlgqt. Hard to change minds if practicing strict EBM
This is more disturbing @ARothschildPT 17 years to adopt evidence based ideas http://t.co/lrbpaghRzU