| Title |
The physical sacrifice of thinking: Investigating the relationship between thinking and physical activity in everyday life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Psychology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1359105314565827 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Todd McElroy, David L Dickinson, Nathan Stroh, Christopher A Dickinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 87% |
| Scientists | 7 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 612. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#37,657
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Psychology
#2
of 2,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#716
of 371,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Psychology
#1
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.