| Title |
A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives on Psychological Science, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1745691616652873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-132383
|
| Authors |
Martin S Hagger, Nikos L D Chatzisarantis, Hugo Alberts, Calvin Octavianus Anggono, Cédric Batailler, Angela R Birt, Ralf Brand, Mark J Brandt, Gene Brewer, Sabrina Bruyneel, Dustin P Calvillo, W Keith Campbell, Peter R Cannon, Marianna Carlucci, Nicholas P Carruth, Tracy Cheung, Adrienne Crowell, Denise T D De Ridder, Siegfried Dewitte, Malte Elson, Jacqueline R Evans, Benjamin A Fay, Bob M Fennis, Anna Finley, Zoë Francis, Elke Heise, Henrik Hoemann, Michael Inzlicht, Sander L Koole, Lina Koppel, Floor Kroese, Florian Lange, Kevin Lau, Bridget P Lynch, Carolien Martijn, Harald Merckelbach, Nicole V Mills, Alexej Michirev, Akira Miyake, Alexandra E Mosser, Megan Muise, Dominique Muller, Milena Muzi, Dario Nalis, Ratri Nurwanti, Henry Otgaar, Michael C Philipp, Pierpaolo Primoceri, Katrin Rentzsch, Lara Ringos, Caroline Schlinkert, Brandon J Schmeichel, Sarah F Schoch, Michel Schrama, Astrid Schütz, Angelos Stamos, Gustav Tinghög, Johannes Ullrich, Michelle vanDellen, Supra Wimbarti, Wanja Wolff, Cleoputri Yusainy, Oulmann Zerhouni, Maria Zwienenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| Japan | 10 | 7% |
| Canada | 9 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 5% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 50% |
| Scientists | 48 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 962 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 939 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 195 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 142 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 138 | 14% |
| Researcher | 102 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 7% |
| Other | 164 | 17% |
| Unknown | 153 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 501 | 52% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 32 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 27 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 121 | 13% |
| Unknown | 214 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 511. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#50,988
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#32
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,007
of 381,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.