@StatmanStu @comilla_s @DLeonhardt @carlquintanilla This is why. One party has consistently fostered the attitude that education is bad because if their voters learn anything their party is toast. Becomes easier and easier to deny science and let the brain
People who distrust scientists and medical experts [1] are, correspondingly, less likely to accept medical consensus about the safety of childhood vaccines. [2] [1] https://t.co/j6aAtU6mM3 [2] https://t.co/CHnxtxsrlS
@MissP318 @Cyberphobe1 @catturd2 Next, a study from the American Politics Research Journal found that anti-intellectual attitude endorsement has been growing in the mass public for decades, especially on the ideological right and that...https://t.co/TnsUPd
Mistrust of sci. experts in the US is deeply personal, and ideologically polarizing. That's why, even in pandemic times, some see attacking those who listen to experts as a political asset -- not a liability. For more, see my 2018 work in APR 👇 https:/
The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States - Matthew Motta, 2018 https://t.co/0LHtXwzaKC
@adamsethlevine @mmildenberger @baobaofzhang Yeah -- we definitely need more work on it! @EricMerkley just wrote a great piece on anti-intel. -- I published a piece on this back in 2018: https://t.co/j6aAtU6mM3
@harpsinyyc @klaszus Start here: https://t.co/WghTEMJm4e
RT @matt_motta: This latter finding is consistent with some work I've done in the past, suggesting that conservatives tend to be more wary…
This latter finding is consistent with some work I've done in the past, suggesting that conservatives tend to be more wary of academic experts. However, more work is needed to ID the precise mechanism. https://t.co/iI64TO1Xn4
The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States - Matthew Motta, 2018 https://t.co/k3He3f8tDM
Thoughts on this @matt_motta? I plugged your paper on anti-intellectualism to a grad student this morning: https://t.co/uxPPHap3sN
PapersOfTheDay "The dynamics and political implications of anti-intellectualism in the United States" https://t.co/t90N9nLHj6 "Considering long‐memory when testing for changepoints in surface temperature: A classification approach based on the [...]" htt
The growing ideological gap in trusting scientists and other experts since 1970; interesting that it only really starts to widen in the Clinton 1990s, not the Reagan 1980s (paper by @matt_motta) https://t.co/FClkQqThIA https://t.co/TQ0YyX1d6M
@tolson00 Another peer-reviewed example: "...recent research (e.g., Gauchat, 2012) suggests that anti-intellectual attitude endorsement has been growing in the mass public for decades, especially on the ideological right. " https://t.co/w0MlkOSiEK
Lots to unpack here, but one thing I keep coming back to is the use of (fake) anti-expert commentary. Did spammers see demonizing experts as a way to persuade FCC? That would be consistent w/some of my work on pol. consequences of anti-expert attitudes: h
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
RT @matt_motta: Excellent roundup of relevant research on expert distrust. (Featuring some of my gobbeldygook!) https://t.co/sDcppSS0rV ht…
RT @matt_motta: Excellent roundup of relevant research on expert distrust. (Featuring some of my gobbeldygook!) https://t.co/sDcppSS0rV ht…
Excellent roundup of relevant research on expert distrust. (Featuring some of my gobbeldygook!) https://t.co/sDcppSS0rV https://t.co/fW9NrLsP9N
RT @MattGrossmann: See Matt's great, timely work on anti-intellectualism in support for Trump & Brexit here: https://t.co/Oh34aEcpfw https…
See Matt's great, timely work on anti-intellectualism in support for Trump & Brexit here: https://t.co/Oh34aEcpfw https://t.co/Tr1ii6ZfyP
See also: Gauchat’s excellent ASR piece, or my recent APR piece on this. https://t.co/sDcppT9BQv
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
"Verbal intelligence plays a strong role in mitigating anti-intellectual sympathies" Interesting work: https://t.co/KM7bSRakpG
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the US - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/1zYW0pM2sr
RT @matt_motta: How do neg. attitudes towards experts influence pol. behavior? New post based on recent APR research @LSEUSAblog https://t…
RT @matt_motta: How do neg. attitudes towards experts influence pol. behavior? New post based on recent APR research @LSEUSAblog https://t…
How do neg. attitudes towards experts influence pol. behavior? New post based on recent APR research @LSEUSAblog https://t.co/Ncr7S8sjbP https://t.co/hFL9hPtSde
RT @theWPSA: "The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States" by @matt_motta https://t.co/9eOFLyQigZ…
"The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States" by @matt_motta https://t.co/9eOFLyQigZ https://t.co/uUI3yjtP9l
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
RT @matt_motta: From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https:/…
From my new work at APR: antagonism boosts support for candidates who dislike experts & denial of exp. consensus. https://t.co/Q3eCIyPMT2 https://t.co/YfqGJCu2Km
RT @matt_motta: Knowledge is only part of the problem. Public resentment toward experts also boosts rejection of sci. consensus. https://t…
RT @matt_motta: Knowledge is only part of the problem. Public resentment toward experts also boosts rejection of sci. consensus. https://t…
RT @matt_motta: Knowledge is only part of the problem. Public resentment toward experts also boosts rejection of sci. consensus. https://t…
RT @matt_motta: Knowledge is only part of the problem. Public resentment toward experts also boosts rejection of sci. consensus. https://t…
RT @matt_motta: Knowledge is only part of the problem. Public resentment toward experts also boosts rejection of sci. consensus. https://t…
Knowledge is only part of the problem. Public resentment toward experts also boosts rejection of sci. consensus. https://t.co/Q3eCIyPMT2 https://t.co/CFTdtaSsK1
RT @autismcrisis: Spotted: my obscure encyclopedia entry on VIQ in autism actually gets cited--in paper on US anti-intellectualism (!) http…
The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States https://t.co/PzINkIZZy3
Spotted: my obscure encyclopedia entry on VIQ in autism actually gets cited--in paper on US anti-intellectualism (!) https://t.co/Ib9W12BX4Z
RT @cult_cognition: The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism iPolitics Research - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/9…
The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism iPolitics Research - Matthew Motta, 2017 https://t.co/9MuUCJTBmS
Job security questionable https://t.co/Zh9u53sfo9 https://t.co/8ZVcJiHnya
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
Political consequences of the #DeathOfExpertise. Cc: @RadioFreeTom https://t.co/Hj6tOCR3UI
RT @MattGrossmann: anti-intellectualism -> rejection of scientific consensus & support for Brexit & Trump but mitigated by intelligence htt…
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
RT @MattGrossmann: anti-intellectualism -> rejection of scientific consensus & support for Brexit & Trump but mitigated by intelligence htt…
RT @MattGrossmann: anti-intellectualism -> rejection of scientific consensus & support for Brexit & Trump but mitigated by intelligence htt…
RT @MattGrossmann: anti-intellectualism -> rejection of scientific consensus & support for Brexit & Trump but mitigated by intelligence htt…
anti-intellectualism -> rejection of scientific consensus & support for Brexit & Trump but mitigated by intelligence https://t.co/Oh34aEcpfw
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
#UMN PhD candidate @matt_motta has a new article published in the @SAGECQPolitics journal American Politics Research! https://t.co/dPDtB2w6mc
RT @matt_motta: New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://…
New APR: I explore the past/present pol. implications of anti-intellectualism, and potential mitigating factors. https://t.co/Gx6f2xtCHj https://t.co/owe24M4vvg