↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Functional Smiles: Tools for Love, Sympathy, and War

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
128 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Functional Smiles: Tools for Love, Sympathy, and War
Published in
Psychological Science, July 2017
DOI 10.1177/0956797617706082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Rychlowska, Rachael E. Jack, Oliver G. B. Garrod, Philippe G. Schyns, Jared D. Martin, Paula M. Niedenthal

Abstract

A smile is the most frequent facial expression, but not all smiles are equal. A social-functional account holds that smiles of reward, affiliation, and dominance serve basic social functions, including rewarding behavior, bonding socially, and negotiating hierarchy. Here, we characterize the facial-expression patterns associated with these three types of smiles. Specifically, we modeled the facial expressions using a data-driven approach and showed that reward smiles are symmetrical and accompanied by eyebrow raising, affiliative smiles involve lip pressing, and dominance smiles are asymmetrical and contain nose wrinkling and upper-lip raising. A Bayesian-classifier analysis and a detection task revealed that the three smile types are highly distinct. Finally, social judgments made by a separate participant group showed that the different smile types convey different social messages. Our results provide the first detailed description of the physical form and social messages conveyed by these three types of functional smiles and document the versatility of these facial expressions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 43%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 58 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 396. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#78,129
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#200
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,737
of 328,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.