↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

Democracy is good for the poor: A procedural replication of Ross (2006)

Overview of attention for article published in Research & Politics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Democracy is good for the poor: A procedural replication of Ross (2006)
Published in
Research & Politics, December 2014
DOI 10.1177/2053168014559094
Authors

Fernando Martel García

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 59%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,038,021
of 22,415,795 outputs
Outputs from Research & Politics
#203
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,994
of 348,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research & Politics
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,415,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.