↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Article Metrics

Democracy is good for the poor: A procedural replication of Ross (2006)

Overview of attention for article published in Research & Politics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Democracy is good for the poor: A procedural replication of Ross (2006)
Published in
Research & Politics, December 2014
DOI 10.1177/2053168014559094
Authors

Fernando Martel García

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 59%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,561,807
of 21,460,400 outputs
Outputs from Research & Politics
#186
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,943
of 343,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research & Politics
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,460,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.