Democracy is good for the poor: A procedural replication of Ross (2006)
Research & Politics, December 2014
Fernando Martel García
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||47%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||17%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||9%|
|Student > Master||2||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||1||4%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||4%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,690,130 outputs
Outputs from Research & Politics
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 363,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research & Politics
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,690,130 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.