↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Gender Differences in Sexual Attraction and Moral Judgment: Research With Artificial Face Models

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 2,425)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
137 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Gender Differences in Sexual Attraction and Moral Judgment: Research With Artificial Face Models
Published in
Psychological Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1177/0033294118756891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio González-Álvarez, Teresa Cervera-Crespo

Abstract

Sexual attraction in humans is influenced by cultural or moral factors, and some gender differences can emerge in this complex interaction. A previous study found that men dissociate sexual attraction from moral judgment more than women do. Two experiments consisting of giving attractiveness ratings to photos of real opposite-sex individuals showed that men, compared to women, were significantly less influenced by the moral valence of a description about the person shown in each photo. There is evidence of some processing differences between real and artificial computer-generated faces. The present study tests the robustness of González-Álvarez's findings and extends the research to an experimental design using artificial face models as stimuli. A sample of 88 young adults (61 females and 27 males, average age 19.32, SD = 2.38) rated the attractiveness of 80 3D artificial face models generated with the FaceGen Modeller 3.5 software. Each face model was paired with a "good" and a "bad" (from a moral point of view) sentence depicting a quality or activity of the person represented in the model (e.g., she/he is an altruistic nurse in Africa vs. she/he is a prominent drug dealer). Results were in line with the previous findings and showed that, with artificial faces as well, sexual attraction is less influenced by morality in men than in women. This gender difference is consistent with an evolutionary perspective on human sexuality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 29%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#450,732
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Reports
#45
of 2,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,530
of 451,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Reports
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.