↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 4,348)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
602 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1455 Mendeley
Title
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
Published in
Psychological Science, February 2018
DOI 10.1177/0956797617741719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gijsbert Stoet, David C. Geary

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,047 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1455 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 192 13%
Student > Master 176 12%
Researcher 132 9%
Student > Bachelor 129 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 82 6%
Other 313 22%
Unknown 431 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 217 15%
Psychology 179 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 67 5%
Computer Science 61 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 53 4%
Other 397 27%
Unknown 481 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3803. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,420
of 26,381,372 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#3
of 4,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 462,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.