| Title |
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Science, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0956797617741719 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gijsbert Stoet, David C. Geary |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,063 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 443 | 11% |
| Spain | 155 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 152 | 4% |
| Japan | 139 | 3% |
| Canada | 71 | 2% |
| Germany | 57 | 1% |
| Belgium | 44 | 1% |
| Australia | 44 | 1% |
| France | 38 | <1% |
| Other | 610 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2310 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3717 | 91% |
| Scientists | 223 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 59 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 47 | 1% |
| Unknown | 17 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1428 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 191 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 176 | 12% |
| Researcher | 131 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 126 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 82 | 6% |
| Other | 308 | 22% |
| Unknown | 414 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 217 | 15% |
| Psychology | 179 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 66 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 61 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 51 | 4% |
| Other | 391 | 27% |
| Unknown | 463 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3807. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,382
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#3
of 4,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 458,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.