@pitiklinov @FITrebelde 17 o 20 años, depende. Pero es algo que conocemos de siempre The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/l4TtUqX5Q4 Knowledge Translation: The Missing Link between Res
@yvonnezlam Oh this is very interesting, thank you! Found some tidbits from the original linked study (from 2011!) and it seems like there's still a lot of opportunity to even improve how often & how well we measure the lags from research -> imple
RT @JuanGrvas: ¿Cuántos años tarda en llegar a la clínica diaria lo que se demuestra que es útil? Entre 17 y 20 años. The answer is 17 yea…
RT @JuanGrvas: ¿Cuántos años tarda en llegar a la clínica diaria lo que se demuestra que es útil? Entre 17 y 20 años. The answer is 17 yea…
RT @JuanGrvas: ¿Cuántos años tarda en llegar a la clínica diaria lo que se demuestra que es útil? Entre 17 y 20 años. The answer is 17 yea…
¿Cuántos años tarda en llegar a la clínica diaria lo que se demuestra que es útil? Entre 17 y 20 años. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: time lags in translational research https://t.co/l4TtUqX5Q4 The Missing Link between Research and Practice
@WearyGoddess @m_adrians @VictorianCHO Share the link? https://t.co/ohlbeGCbMf
RT @GiniaJo: @UrsulaV Found the citation for the 17 years. Free to read: https://t.co/pHQ2oYnqhT
@UrsulaV Found the citation for the 17 years. Free to read: https://t.co/pHQ2oYnqhT
RT @earnest_rs: @curiousdatacat I remind them that they shouldn’t actually expect their PCP to be up to date on recent science, that they’r…
@curiousdatacat I remind them that they shouldn’t actually expect their PCP to be up to date on recent science, that they’re always trying to do better, but it still takes more than a decade for research to be implemented in clinical practice. https://t.c
@RJ_NerdDad @ianfmusgrave @jonathanstea > Huh? The FDA doesn't regulate yoga 🤦 Right. It doesn't regulate many of the components of integrative medicine, which is why the idea of "well the FDA hasn't approved it yet" is a nonsense statement. > The
Great observation but #Fundamental #misconception! It is not the last mile of a round. It is just the beginning of a long path of Implementation and Dissemination of RPT. The answer is 14 years; what’s the question? https://t.co/uErUVqUbvm
RT @PedsAnesNet: @AirwayMxAcademy @adroitsurgical @AirwayLegend @KevinPaulKelly @NicholasChrimes @dasairway Just gonna leave this here… htt…
RT @PedsAnesNet: @AirwayMxAcademy @adroitsurgical @AirwayLegend @KevinPaulKelly @NicholasChrimes @dasairway Just gonna leave this here… htt…
@AirwayMxAcademy @adroitsurgical @AirwayLegend @KevinPaulKelly @NicholasChrimes @dasairway Just gonna leave this here… https://t.co/jGqoBQmPsu
RT @firebug70: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/dRjLsjwNfI
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/dRjLsjwNfI
@DuMuet @RayanBounab1 I mean, according to this paper that's a kind of glib answer to a complex topic: https://t.co/P5bMWnnUgl
17 years is the average time lapse needed to translate scientific research into implemented patient benefits in medical settings: https://t.co/jaU4J6IMw9
@KtCott The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/5XDGsH0iEV
@derkrunhaar @IvoKnotnerus Oudje al, maar verwacht dat het niet veel beter is. https://t.co/r2ybMZpyue
@GregLehman Only another 6 years mate. https://t.co/cTLytDd9Xp
@HamHead5813 @GeorgeOu @LauraPowellEsq I guess when they get the research on it situated, it appears it will be about 17 years after that. https://t.co/FlBEof45ue
@RedGoldGreen_ Is what you are really after a science paper on this topic? Or are you not open to looking at the research on this topic (on which my statements are made)? For anyone interested here's a good starting place... https://t.co/DdJlEJnE9i
@1goodtern We place far too much faith in our doctors. Med school admittance is difficult, but do you know what they call the person who graduates in last place in each med school graduating class? Doctor. https://t.co/RkoiNMSJ2W
@akmcintyre Medical inertia is such that it takes this long for sound evidence to find its way into practice. I understand it’s more like 25 years in paediatrics, & in the case of 💉 NSEs it’s just all too hard. https://t.co/9sEGux3HPE
@Trules25 @VNikolian @abhishekpar @jennyshaomd @DrHenriksen @eurohernias @AmericanHernia @BJSurgery @FilipMuysoms @ThomasKorgaard @JakobBurcharth @DeerenbergEva @hgok @rfortelny @plasticfish83 @DrReddy_HPB @JBartRose On average - 17 years from publication
@grahamwalker @NateApathy @ACPinternists @AnnalsofIM Cue the obligatory 17 year adoption lag citation https://t.co/GQB52Lvv6C
Medical censorship! AB 2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/YKSou1ZOvI #opposeab2098 https://t.co/LesTlGVLQQ via @Freedomkeepersu
RT @gogoenvironment: @cstroeckw 2/2 One issue is the huge lag time between scientific research discoveries & clinical implementation of tho…
Ich spreche oft von genau diesen 17 Jahren, die es braucht, bis Ergebnisse aus der #Wissenschaft in der #Praxis ankommen. Nur falls sich jemand wundert, warum wir mit #MCAS noch nicht weiter sind... 😵💫🥺
@cstroeckw 2/2 One issue is the huge lag time between scientific research discoveries & clinical implementation of those findings. This meta-study found the average delay is an unbelievable 17 years! Maybe med schools need big mandatory continuing educ
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/wblCX80880 #opposeab2098 https://t.co/dG0CE1lg
@AdamDraper @PeterDiamandis It’s probably 17 yrs, though point well taken / approximately 2 decades. https://t.co/omOTKWyxEV https://t.co/778PmaLRTJ
RT @MotameniA: @Dr_Stepheny @TraumaSoapBoxes @DissanaikeMD I always tell our learners it will take a lot of education and effort to make th…
@Dr_Stepheny @TraumaSoapBoxes @DissanaikeMD I always tell our learners it will take a lot of education and effort to make this common practice. Here is a study on time lags in the health research translation process. It take about 17 years to go from resea
Research has shown that it takes 17 years on average for a new #innovation to reach 50% of the #healthcare delivery system (see: The Answer Is 17 Years, What Is The Question: Understanding Time Lags In Translational Research). https://t.co/W8nBZeaqOZ #beh
RT @SuzanneLinn3: Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger…
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/h0cDfIJhri #opposeab2098 https://t.co/MGqnjQro
@parthaskar @NICEComms @DSNforumUK @hilarynathan01 @LizPerraudin @AdrianLong3 @cahmn @NHSDiabetesProg @JaneMCummings @DrAliLumb @drpatrickholmes And is it 17 years to get evidence into practice? We need to find ways to bring the time down from guideline pr
RT @sunshin27318070: Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a dan…
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/MqnBIIRuSb #opposeab2098 https://t.co/9znlfqK3
RT @Beepballer: Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger t…
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/wseKf4ewKD #opposeab2098 https://t.co/XyTadZ3Z
@Flix548 @Jovan127th In short, you are better off not discounting your own ability to research and the knowledge and experience of those in your network who can enhance your health and share their own experiences. So many diseases are officially 'cause u
@nialldowney @Cambridge_Uni @BrennanSurgeon @davidjvaughan Fascinating and all rather dispiriting. https://t.co/iEGPBvkEsr Also the time lag between the development of operational guidelines, clinical protocols, training resources and their practical appli
@dr_m3rt You’re not far off numbers wise https://t.co/rDawb9pDIE
It takes 17 years according to one study for science to get out of the lab and into real life, according to a 2011 study. I know it's 2011, but still! @SCINET_INC and the whole #desci community are working to solve this! https://t.co/OSGJ1CQOC1 https://t
RT @RawlsMD: Outdated knowledge is one reason why the #healthcare system often doesn't work for those with #Lymedisease & other chronic ill…
via RawlsMD: https://t.co/IWlKlgCj6t #lyme #spoonie
RT @RawlsMD: Outdated knowledge is one reason why the #healthcare system often doesn't work for those with #Lymedisease & other chronic ill…
Outdated knowledge is one reason why the #healthcare system often doesn't work for those with #Lymedisease & other chronic illnesses. At best, the #research is nearly two decades old, according to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine: https://t
RT @BAHealthFreedom: Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a dan…
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/TR8TLVGHLE #opposeab2098 https://t.co/lk7s1GRY
RT @ejsanchez92399: Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a dang…
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/qwmMeUS0FO #opposeab2098 https://t.co/uGJwXnhI
Studies show that it takes an an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. AB2098 is a danger to the advancement of medicine on a disease that is extremely new. Source: https://t.co/wseKf4ewKD #opposeab2098 https://t.co/XyTadZ3Z
@EricJaegerTNG Bench to bedside is said to take 17 years to change practice. This goes back to Semmelweis introducing hand washing in the 1840’s to reduce infant fatalities. https://t.co/vIlvTS6Air
RT @KatieLucasPT: @Pillars_of_PT Yep. Here’s the link: https://t.co/WvaOFXUp4A https://t.co/yFLwTAVcXZ
@Pillars_of_PT Yep. Here’s the link: https://t.co/WvaOFXUp4A https://t.co/yFLwTAVcXZ
RT @AKSampson: @sboots @sboots I worked in healthcare for yrs and felt this pain. It took absolutely forever to translate evidence into pra…
@sboots @sboots I worked in healthcare for yrs and felt this pain. It took absolutely forever to translate evidence into practice. This paper is a bit meta - it is a case in point: https://t.co/OwZulAi5Vb Hey, at least no one dies if I don't get to use Tre
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/ozIes3og3C
RT @LocalRachel: It takes an average of 17 years for scientific research to become medical practice (and much of it is ignored anyway if no…
RT @LocalRachel: It takes an average of 17 years for scientific research to become medical practice (and much of it is ignored anyway if no…
RT @LocalRachel: It takes an average of 17 years for scientific research to become medical practice (and much of it is ignored anyway if no…
It takes an average of 17 years for scientific research to become medical practice (and much of it is ignored anyway if no-one is drawing attention to it)! I cannot wait for AI to be properly involved with medical decision-making! https://t.co/DdJlEJn6jK
RT @KarimKhan_IMHA: KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research…
KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION: The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/8BBSZ9b4tD #KTConnects Thanks @HlthResearchBC for a great webinar. @PhysioKTBroker @JuliaLangton @jonathancgrant https://t
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/tLZEogs6UT
RT @AnnChildersMD: While medical Twitter experts are eager to witness positive change in public health now, unlike the tech industry medici…
While medical Twitter experts are eager to witness positive change in public health now, unlike the tech industry medicine is slow to adapt; way, way slow https://t.co/U4mfipIIxz
@RippleCreekNW Medical zeitgeists resist change. My tech industry Electrical Engineer/Mathematician husband reacted with surprise and disbelief when I told him that https://t.co/U4mfipIIxz, that medical journal articles aren't "open source", and that the
as far as I can see the Semmelweis effect is in full swing, and don't even bother arguing with me unless you've done sh**load of recondite research 😃 https://t.co/wkwn9qm2S7 https://t.co/xny3OYfmuw
Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510-520. https://t.co/MvViEGWJcF
@ChronicallyTina @HenryFordNews It apparently takes ~17 years for published research to be adopted in clinical practice. If payments were tightly linked to outcomes, I’m betting that time would shorten and ERs like @HenryFordNews would listen closely to pa
@gasbagheera @SAEMEBM @AcademicEmerMed Here is the reference for the 17 years and 14% claim. https://t.co/hzsIi062O0
I’ve heard the lag between rigorous, accepted research and patient care is 17 years! https://t.co/tGmf6xDjWC If true, some obvious implications: 1) tremendous opportunity for ML/AI to assist doctors and 2) your doctor probably not up-to-date on the latest
@nebweber @MythinformedMKE @CortesSteve “It is frequently stated that it takes an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice.” https://t.co/LklO5hIMuL
@ProfPaulRalph 2. I often mention the standard estimate for translating medical research to clinical practice (17 years), but there are issues with how we estimate this number (see https://t.co/Q0TrWUwhFi).
@kiwirip @raykellyfitness @scoopit Well, just give it 17yrs and it’ll find its way into practice 😟 https://t.co/9sEGuwLyBw
How long does it take research evidence to reach clinical practice? The answer is 17 years. (On average!) https://t.co/aYyPFv2ffg
@sabs_kam @LilyMegaw @DigitalKway @imperialcollege Try 17 years! https://t.co/fQGGCVmijD
Understanding time lags in #translational #research, by Zoë Slote Morris, @drstevenwooding, @jonathancgrant #ScienceTwitter #AcademicTwitter https://t.co/MvViEGWJcF
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/42FXFeuV3J The article is 10 years old yet still relevant and outlines the average time for new scientific ideas to achieve acceptance or change c
@EricKlinenberg No, you have done very well. https://t.co/cC2Goi4jl1
Q: How long does it take before new research is translated into clinical care? A: 17 years. 😬😟 https://t.co/NkccsWI5Gj
Why do researchers or analysts know more than those that practice medicine? Because for lots of reasons it takes an average of 17 years for peer reviewed studies to become actual evidence that is used on patients health. https://t.co/DdJlEJn6jK
RT @34CBPT: リサーチが翻訳され理解され実践されていくまでに17年ものタイムラグがあることを示唆した論文です。 https://t.co/9zfuFj9TiP #34cbpt
リサーチが翻訳され理解され実践されていくまでに17年ものタイムラグがあることを示唆した論文です。 https://t.co/9zfuFj9TiP #34cbpt
RT @inaphenomeneuro: エビデンスのある基礎研究から医療実践に橋渡しされるまでのタイムラグは平均17年。23の研究レヴューから。理論と実践のギャップは、泳ぎ方を知ることと、実際に泳げることの差として哲学的問いでもあるが、17年は長い。社会の価値観の変容もそれぐ…
RT @inaphenomeneuro: エビデンスのある基礎研究から医療実践に橋渡しされるまでのタイムラグは平均17年。23の研究レヴューから。理論と実践のギャップは、泳ぎ方を知ることと、実際に泳げることの差として哲学的問いでもあるが、17年は長い。社会の価値観の変容もそれぐ…