エビデンスのある基礎研究から医療実践に橋渡しされるまでのタイムラグは平均17年。23の研究レヴューから。理論と実践のギャップは、泳ぎ方を知ることと、実際に泳げることの差として哲学的問いでもあるが、17年は長い。社会の価値観の変容もそれぐらいかかるのかもしれない。 https://t.co/mqRVCaBj2t https://t.co/k8VUPIKKce
@EsportsEnigmist It usually takes 17 years for research to be implemented into practice. https://t.co/pzCXg4kdgk
RT @kvenere: @Dr_Ridge_DPT @danrhon @rwilly2003 @PTPintcast good reads re: oft-cited 17 year figure https://t.co/fKnxHuSOJ2 https://t.co/E…
@Dr_Ridge_DPT @danrhon @rwilly2003 @PTPintcast good reads re: oft-cited 17 year figure https://t.co/fKnxHuSOJ2 https://t.co/E1Fpj7WoWM
RT @KarimKhan_IMHA: Kudos @jonathancgrant Dr Jonathan Grant. Author of The New Power University (terrific). Now I see you published this cl…
RT @KarimKhan_IMHA: Kudos @jonathancgrant Dr Jonathan Grant. Author of The New Power University (terrific). Now I see you published this cl…
RT @KarimKhan_IMHA: Kudos @jonathancgrant Dr Jonathan Grant. Author of The New Power University (terrific). Now I see you published this cl…
Kudos @jonathancgrant Dr Jonathan Grant. Author of The New Power University (terrific). Now I see you published this classic (>1500 citations) back in the day (2011) Dr Grant! https://t.co/8BBSZ9b4tD (FREE and often discussed). What's your number today
@MackayIM @zeynep back in da day was amazed by this article https://t.co/F8KaBUfuWk
RT @LabGirl_Chloe: It can take more than a decade for medical research to influence clinical practice. This is why I bring doctors article…
RT @LabGirl_Chloe: It can take more than a decade for medical research to influence clinical practice. This is why I bring doctors article…
It can take more than a decade for medical research to influence clinical practice. This is why I bring doctors articles. Unfortunately, they are often irritated; but I don’t know how else to move my treatment forward in a timely manner. https://t.co/dR0
@GuiPhilipps @hiddensmallcaps @eden2020eu We humans are in general really slow to adapt new knowledge to practice (it isn't just medicine). Journal of Royal Society of Medicine says "17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice" https://t.co/
@KatLewis_SLT @KOHCltd Because this: https://t.co/9I96Y3UcHn. So glad we have implementation and improvement scientists now that are working to improve our understanding of how to more quickly transfer research into practice.
RT @TheSGEM: @FutureDocs @jeffreylinder @abbyWUim @SocietyGIM Because of the knowledge translation (KT) gap. it can take 17 years for 14% o…
RT @TheSGEM: @FutureDocs @jeffreylinder @abbyWUim @SocietyGIM Because of the knowledge translation (KT) gap. it can take 17 years for 14% o…
@FutureDocs @jeffreylinder @abbyWUim @SocietyGIM Because of the knowledge translation (KT) gap. it can take 17 years for 14% of high-quality, clinically relevant information to reach the patient. Patients deserve the best care, based on the best evidence.
RT @anecdatally: I'm curious about time to translation of new stat/epi methods into practice. There's an oft-cited "17 years" lag between b…
I'm curious about time to translation of new stat/epi methods into practice. There's an oft-cited "17 years" lag between bench and bedside in medical research (challenging to quantify, good pub here: https://t.co/Mz6ncXa01d)
It takes an average of 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practice. Longer if it's a controversial topic. https://t.co/AtaXncJHxZ
@HormoneEquilib Another reflection of the approx 17 years gap between data coming out and becoming guidelines? https://t.co/8hPVfZ7B7y
There is a 17 year lag in aging research being available to the world. https://t.co/4ONlUlc5Tj
@nate_friedman @KirstyChallen @SAEMonline @AcademicEmerMed @LWestafer @AliRaja_MD @meganranney @First10EM @the_TOTAL_EM KT - Knowledge translation We have evidence that it can take >10 years for high-quality, clinically relevant information to reach th
RT @PamelaSnow2: Well if it takes 17yrs to translate knowledge into practice, 2021 should be party time! 🥳 https://t.co/joOlOkh4Nz
RT @PamelaSnow2: Well if it takes 17yrs to translate knowledge into practice, 2021 should be party time! 🥳 https://t.co/joOlOkh4Nz https://…
Well if it takes 17yrs to translate knowledge into practice, 2021 should be party time! 🥳 https://t.co/joOlOkh4Nz
*Reference List* https://t.co/ath0fhPiOT
@FfionDavies4 #Knowledgetranslation is 17 years [https://t.co/vu8BLhWaI0] right? So only 11 years til we have gender equity at conferences, hurrah!! #IWish
RT @spielwomann: Wishing someone would look at this again in light of social media. We should be using it better! The answer is 17 years,…
RT @spielwomann: Wishing someone would look at this again in light of social media. We should be using it better! The answer is 17 years,…
RT @spielwomann: Wishing someone would look at this again in light of social media. We should be using it better! The answer is 17 years,…
Wishing someone would look at this again in light of social media. We should be using it better! The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/YWKkQfdw6e
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/o7qdTrw2EG
Is it still 17 years? The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research https://t.co/2xed7zE2Lh
RT @atomicaceso: It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just ke…
RT @BrochaSternOT: @_allisulli That statistic still shocks me every time I see it! I found this discussion of the often-cited 17 year lag…
RT @BrochaSternOT: @_allisulli That statistic still shocks me every time I see it! I found this discussion of the often-cited 17 year lag…
@_allisulli That statistic still shocks me every time I see it! I found this discussion of the often-cited 17 year lag in knowledge translation interesting: https://t.co/9Z1SvgrnTs (And is @SusanLinOT the first author on the Murphy & Robinson 2010 pap
RT @TheSGEM: @kenjaques @LogicofScience @SAEMEBM I like the quote from Dr. Jackson. Data from 2011 suggests it takes 17 years for 14% of…
@kenjaques @LogicofScience @SAEMEBM I like the quote from Dr. Jackson. Data from 2011 suggests it takes 17 years for 14% of high-quality evidence to reach the patient. https://t.co/hzsIi062O0
“The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational #research” https://t.co/4ZXVFDDNX4 It takes on average 17 years for research to show up in practice. Whaaaa?!
We know from other research there is a knowledge translation (KT) gap. It can take 17 years for 14% of high-quality, clinically relevant information to reach the patient. This is too long Patients deserve the best care, based on the best evidence http
@DRouselle Consensus is misleading - it does not mean that the majority are correct; rather, just that a particular opinion (with/without evidence) is the most accepted. Knowledge translation from science to frontline medicine is far too slow to benefit
RT @StephenPiment: It takes an average of 17 years for the published findings of medical research to make its way into mainstream clinical…
It takes an average of 17 years for the published findings of medical research to make its way into mainstream clinical practice. https://t.co/phxqnhPMK1
@SonoStache @SAlerhand It takes on average 17 years for research to become day-to-day clinical practice https://t.co/yGr0xUI4eI @DanielLICHTENS1 first description of "lung pulse" was in 2003 https://t.co/B1vUQ4EFF3 --it's about time! Images from https://t.
This classic paper set a new bar for titles. https://t.co/MGgge4yzJG
@physiotalk Out with the old and in with the new! Systems are slow to adapt to empirical research (17 years to be precise) . COVID has brought us from cognitive dissonance to forced action - it would be foolish not to capitalise on modernising healthcare h
RT @KWernliPhysio: New episode tomorrow. The paper I'm referring to in the video below is here: https://t.co/yA6Ul4wehh https://t.co/0Bprs…
@theshoulderdoc A lot more than it should. https://t.co/cTLytDd9Xp
RT @KWernliPhysio: New episode tomorrow. The paper I'm referring to in the video below is here: https://t.co/yA6Ul4wehh
“Be explicit with conflicts of interest” Now that has got me interested👇👍
RT @KWernliPhysio: New episode tomorrow. The paper I'm referring to in the video below is here: https://t.co/yA6Ul4wehh
RT @KWernliPhysio: New episode tomorrow. The paper I'm referring to in the video below is here: https://t.co/yA6Ul4wehh
New episode tomorrow. The paper I'm referring to in the video below is here: https://t.co/yA6Ul4wehh
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Good title. From 2011. This paper should have impact within 8 years. https://t.co/CRtkC7vnof https://t.co/JJYL36jN2Z
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Good title. From 2011. This paper should have impact within 8 years. https://t.co/CRtkC7vnof https://t.co/JJYL36jN2Z
Good title. From 2011. This paper should have impact within 8 years. https://t.co/CRtkC7vnof https://t.co/JJYL36jN2Z
Nel campo della salute, tra la pubblicazione di un risultato scientifico e la sua messa in pratica trascorrono 17 anni. Un gap che limita molto lo sviluppo della società, nella sua totalità. https://t.co/mPGwif4yNd
@KrutikaKuppalli @hectorology WADR, DrK - you’re not “in science”, you’re “in medicine”. You are NOT a scientist. Science is not a profession, it’s a process/way of knowing. It is well known and established that scientific knowledge takes approx 17 yrs to
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Have you heard the quote that it takes 17 years to turn research into ... action/policy/clinical guidelines? Pleased to find…
@Dr_Christoph @KMKing_Psych A quick search led me to this paper. From a research perspective is interesting, from a patient perspective I feel a lot differently... https://t.co/OBlxUPpITq
@ProfFeynman @SAEMonline @SAEMEBM Here is the citation https://t.co/hzsIi062O0
@lewis_goodall Some data on this. But note it is an average (of 17 yrs). https://t.co/nUHYAx3lC0
I think a lot about how it takes 17 years for evidence to become commonly accepted. https://t.co/7UXXfh5lqv https://t.co/MkI84T8mH7
@jkimb57 @embasic @hp_ems @EMS1 @EMSBlogs @EMSTODAY @EMSWorldFans @the_TOTAL_EM @EMO_Daddy @SAEMEBM @emergmedottawa It has been documented that it takes >10 (17 years for 14%) of the evidence to reach the patient. https://t.co/uvaIh2MxMT https://t.co/Y
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Have you heard the quote that it takes 17 years to turn research into ... action/policy/clinical guidelines? Pleased to find…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Have you heard the quote that it takes 17 years to turn research into ... action/policy/clinical guidelines? Pleased to find…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Have you heard the quote that it takes 17 years to turn research into ... action/policy/clinical guidelines? Pleased to find…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Have you heard the quote that it takes 17 years to turn research into ... action/policy/clinical guidelines? Pleased to find…
Have you heard the quote that it takes 17 years to turn research into ... action/policy/clinical guidelines? Pleased to find it in a PhD trainee's paper today! FREE. Thanks! k2 https://t.co/2GKCEDg7vw https://t.co/ErDld9RqOh
@BomberATDoc The old 17 years lag? https://t.co/dCE4omE8XK
As all good academics... here is the reference, and in 2011 it was actually 17 years for health based research. https://t.co/yaQBNLOCTA
@and_kell Everyone will have a different tolerance for what’s too long. Teaching knowledge translation the 5yrs doesn’t seem long. It can take 17 years for 14% of high-quality clinically relevant info to reach the patient. I’m trying to cut the KT gap with
RT @PlanetJanice: It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just k…
@MThallinger @MatthewBorgman1 @SapnaKmd Still, less than 17 years... 🤷♀️ https://t.co/gvfNKwtISe
RT @PlanetJanice: It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just k…
RT @PlanetJanice: It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just k…
RT @PlanetJanice: It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just k…
RT @PlanetJanice: It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just k…
It’s been over 60 years for benzodiazepines and the problem hasn’t even been defined properly. Now what! Do we all just keep getting maimed and killed?
@med1cinewoman @EpigeneticWhisp @uTobian @NEOrganics @NightShiftMD @lovereignssupr1 @DrKND @va_shiva @lifebiomedguru @AgeofAutism @epochchanger @kenjaques @safe_effective @LotusOak2 Taking a long time to change practice is not unusual in medicine. We refer
RT @DawnaMughalPhD: Perhaps a lot of money has been wasted collecting data that were not translated to prog/practice impacting individual&…
Perhaps a lot of money has been wasted collecting data that were not translated to prog/practice impacting individual& public health? Education? So we keep talking abt the same problems over & over again. I was once told, We have enough data. It's
@DawnaMughalPhD @drbutsch @DrRobertKushner @GabeSmolarz @STOPObesity Translation of medical innovation into practice is slow. Maddeningly slow. https://t.co/ypDUHVWk6R
RT @Aideen_QUB: Translating scientific discoveries into patient benefit takes 17 years!! **Seems about right** But how on earth does that…
Translating scientific discoveries into patient benefit takes 17 years!! **Seems about right** But how on earth does that fit into a REF cycle? #loveResearch #timelyResearch #policyrelevantResearch #impactfulResearch https://t.co/bWPSkazr8L
@rob_sams @Mental_Elf @EverymindAU @AndreaPugh1 @gracecr8tive Someone else asked this too and the answer: https://t.co/SfhA8SHRLD…
RT @Mental_Elf: @RoseAnnieFlo @Dee_Knipe Lots of studies looking at gap btwn health research & practice. Good place to start: https://t.co/…
@RoseAnnieFlo @Dee_Knipe Lots of studies looking at gap btwn health research & practice. Good place to start: https://t.co/myU3Ee8UYk Re: impact of @NICEComms guidelines, there's this mental health 'impact' report: https://t.co/v2NeFV6Ono Personally,
@HomegrownJoan @kenjaques @CaulfieldTim @MareadelPortill @OslerHealth @DocMCohen @DrPChouinard @crackedscience @BernieGarrett @jonathanstea @StanKutcher @picardonhealth @GidMK @McGillOSS @FionaMattatall Forgot to include the reference. The actual number is
@AdvocatLyme @Limeylime2 @Lymenews Give them this: from The Royal Society: https://t.co/roV6DEfN7c
It takes ~17 years for new research findings (new tools/systems/drugs) to be used on patients. 17 years to *implement* an idea we just confirmed is beneficial This area is called 'Translational Research' Papers like this explore the concept: https://t.
@ii1111 Is this your source for the 17-year-rule? I had not heard that term before. https://t.co/1NAMI3S0qe