The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Visual Environment, Attention Allocation, and Learning in Young Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Science, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0956797614533801 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna V. Fisher, Karrie E. Godwin, Howard Seltman |
| Abstract |
A large body of evidence supports the importance of focused attention for encoding and task performance. Yet young children with immature regulation of focused attention are often placed in elementary-school classrooms containing many displays that are not relevant to ongoing instruction. We investigated whether such displays can affect children's ability to maintain focused attention during instruction and to learn the lesson content. We placed kindergarten children in a laboratory classroom for six introductory science lessons, and we experimentally manipulated the visual environment in the classroom. Children were more distracted by the visual environment, spent more time off task, and demonstrated smaller learning gains when the walls were highly decorated than when the decorations were removed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 10% |
| United States | 17 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 12 | 5% |
| Belgium | 9 | 4% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 127 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 195 | 83% |
| Scientists | 28 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 456 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 20% |
| Unknown | 110 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 159 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 58 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 21 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 78 | 16% |
| Unknown | 134 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#55,537
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#129
of 4,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365
of 241,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.